Project Information

Darling River Eco Corridor 28

Human Induced Regeneration

Before deciding to implement not one, but two carbon projects at Conlea, Peter Johnston thought long and hard about whether running a project would enhance or hinder his cattle enterprise.

If he hadn’t decided to stop clearing native forest and regenerate suppressed vegetation, Peter would have absolutely continued down the path of clearing land for grazing. “You toss-up which situation might work out, and we’ve made the right decision,” he says.

That decision has seen Peter become responsible for the management of over 6,500 hectares of established native forest, and is now regenerating and additional 12,000 hectares alongside his livestock, which he rotates on and off the project areas to manage grazing pressure.

Peter says the changes he’s made to his land management to account for the projects has delivered significant benefits for the land and his business. “The amount of regrowth since we started the project is huge,” he says. “We had to move our stock off during the drought, but the speed with which the ground cover came back was amazing. We’ve been able to bring them back and keep them here ever since.”

The carbon project has also funded material purchases for ongoing fencing on Conlea and helped Peter invest in another property.

Key Benefits

Carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change
Protection and regeneration of native vegetation and habitat
Investment in farm infrastructure such as fencing
Increased drought resilience and faster recovery post-drought
Business expansion

UN Sustainable
Development Goals

Statistics

Methodology

Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest – 1.1 Methodology Determination 2013

Registered ID

Date registered

May 2018

Project area

12,386 ha

Permanence

100 years

Location

Bourke Shire, NSW

The Guidelines also require a map accuracy assessment be completed before offset reporting.  This assessment must include the field sample plots, which can be used in conjunction with remote sensing samples.  The Clean Energy Regulator will accept mapping accuracies at or above 85 per cent for pre-existing forest and forest potential classification types.  The overall accuracy of the Darling River Eco Corridor 28 classification was 86% which is greater than the 85% minimum requirement of The Guidelines.

After the completion of the map accuracy assessment, any additional exclusion areas were delineated prior to finalising the initial stratification. The extent of exclusion areas (totalling 20,951 ha), comprised of pre-existing forest cover (2,022 ha) and areas which classified as having no forest potential (584 ha) . Through this process a final eligible CEA area of 12,386 ha was confirmed.

Footnotes

[1]  Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011 Section 27
[2] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest—1.1) Methodology Determination 2013  c3 Section 4
[3] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest—1.1) Methodology Determination 2013  c3 Section 28
[4] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[5] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[6] Forest cover assessment date has the same meaning as that given by section 9AA(6) of the CFI Rule.
[7] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[8] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[9] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Rule 2015 Section 9AA(6)