fbpx Skip to main content

When Purchasing Carbon Credits, Quality is Crucial

Not all carbon offsets are created equal. And everyone from Queensland to Qantas, from Norway to Nestle, is in pursuit of them. According to the Carbon market Institute (CMI) Net Zero certifications have doubled since 2019 and RepuTex predicts the actual value of Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) is projected to double by 2030.  

But as companies, governments, celebrities and even major airports clamour to offset their emissions, not enough questions are being asked about precisely where these offsets are coming from. 

When it comes to carbon farming projects, quality is important. GreenCollar’s portfolio of projects stack values to deliver prospective buyers environmental solutions that not only mitigate climate but variously tackle biodiversity conservation, soil rehabilitation, invasive species management and water-quality improvement.  

In the current carbon credit goldrush, where record highs have been recorded this year in both the EU and Australia, there has been, until recently, limited discussion around what determines quality in carbon offsets. 

Quality in carbon credit projects is determined by the source and nature of the projects. GreenCollar’s projects definitionally have additionalities built into their design, so they are able to provide a range of environmental solutions beyond just climate mitigation. These additionalities, also known as ‘Co-Benefits’, aren’t—as the name may suggest—incidental. They are the social, cultural, economic and environmental windfalls created by carbon farming projects.  

GreenCollar’s carbon farming projects have delivered a range of on-farm and on Country environmental benefits including biodiversity and habitat preservation through Avoided Land Clearing, soil remediation through changes in tilling and grazing practices, and flow-on cultural benefits from credits generated by sustainable burning practices.  

For buyers wanting to enhance their environmental reputation, upgrade their Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) principals and continue to develop in accordance with UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) guidelines, the bottom-line benefits are well documented. As large companies flock to make Net Zero commitments, some have exposed their brand to risk by fulfilling their commitments using low-quality credits. But fortunately, as the industry continues to grow, assessing the quality of carbon offset projects is becoming easier, at least locally.  

Projects wishing to generate ACCUs are verified by the Carbon Market Institute (CMI) Carbon Project Registry, which assesses all eligible carbon projects, from sustainable Savannah burning to vegetation management projects and provides a description and contact point for prospective ACCU purchasers. And quality is beginning to matter from the demand side of the market as well as supply. Organisations quantifying and creating a framework to reduce their emissions using the Climate Active Carbon Neutral Standard (CACNS) 

The quality of their carbon farming projects is what truly differentiates GreenCollar from other industry players. Not only does their attention to quality deliver a range of benefits to varied environmental concerns, but also visits enhanced benefits to land managers and a comprehensive brand story for investors looking to publicise their environmental successes. 

Related Articles

11 Sep 2023

Reef Credits: Grazing Land Management Method

New Ground-breaking Reef Credit Method for Grazing Land Management open for consultation   A new Grazing Land Management (GLM) Method that measures and values the reduction in sediment losses resulting...
19 Jun 2023

Reef Credits – 3 different approaches to meet different needs

When Reef Credits launched in 2020, there was just one way farmers and other land managers could get involved – by improving fertiliser management to reduce the flow of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to the Great Barrier Reef. Now, three years later, there are two new ways to get involved that suit a broader spectrum of farming operations.
19 Jun 2023

Reef Credits or Grants – carefully considering the best options for you

Environmental markets are not dissimilar to farming or commodity markets. The difference being, instead of food or fibre production, environmental markets measure and place a value on and trade in cleaner air, water or improved habitat and biodiversity.
13 Jun 2023

What are Reef Credits and how are they generated?

Being paid to implement best practice land management and deliver cleaner water to the Reef, without negatively impacting productivity may seem too good to be true. But according to GreenCollar Business Development Manager Bart Dryden, and the numerous farmers already running Reef Credit projects, it really is a win:win transaction that benefits both the farmer and the environment.
07 Mar 2023

The impact of fire on carbon projects

Rain, drought, flood and fire. All elements that impact how a property is run and require constant attention and management. And while good rainfall seasons are always welcome, the corresponding build-up of vegetation flows through to the need to manage fire risk as weather conditions turn.
31 Jan 2023

The COP15 agreement on biodiversity – how has it been received?

The United Nations Biodiversity Conference, COP15, concluded in mid December in Montreal, Canada with an ambitious and historic global agreement among 196 of the almost 200 countries in attendance, though...