Project Information
Rose Isle
Human Induced Regeneration
Rose Isle is a family run grazing operation near Louth in New South Wales. Garry and Samantha Mooring purchased the property from Garry’s parents in 1983 and now run sheep and cattle across the station while also regenerating close to 8,000ha of native vegetation.
Rose Isle sits across two contrasting landscapes. To the east it is undulating, soft, sandy country with scattered bluestone ridges, and to the west there is a flood plain and large stone hills.
The land has been continually grazed since the 1960’s, with notable levels of feral pests including goats, rabbits and pigs prevalent since the 1970’s. The combined pressure of continued grazing and feral animals left the land degraded, which became a real issue when drought hit the region in 2017.
During the drought, the Moorings were spending a lot of money on feed, and while their heart said they had to start destocking, their mind said they needed to run the land even harder to make ends meet.
Fortunately, there was another option because the Moorings had registered a regenerative carbon project in 2015.
The income from carbon farming allowed them to buy in more feed for their livestock and remove grazing pressure from land that badly needed a rest. It also enabled them to invest in managing the land better, installing new infrastructure such as fencing, and are planning to futureproof their operation by building hay sheds and grain silos that mean they’re better prepared for hard times.
The Moorings also report improvements in the landscape, with increased groundcover that returns much quicker than it used to, a lot less erosion, and even natural recovery of eroded areas.
Key Benefits
UN Sustainable
Development Goals
Statistics
Methodology
Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest – 1.1 Methodology (2013)
Registered ID
Date registered
July 2015
Project area
7,722 ha
Permanence
100yrs
Location
Louth, NSW
This project is located South West of Bourke in NSW in the Cobar Peneplair bioregion. The land consists of two contrasting landscapes. The eastern part is made up of undulating soft sandy country with blue stone ridges, and the western part is comprised of floodplains, undulating sandy country and large stone hills. The dominant species observed on the property from field surveys include Eremophila sturtii, Acacia aneura, Senna artemisioides, Dodonaea viscosa, Eremophila longifolia and Flindersia maculosa.
The objective of this project is to regenerate natural woodlands and shrublands. This is achieved by controlled grazing and feral animal management across the project area along with fencing upgrades. In addition to sequestering carbon, regeneration of native vegetation in the project area reverses land degradation caused by feral goats and livestock and stabilises soils reducing erosion.
The Project (ERF101641) was declared project under the ‘Human Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Forest 1.1’ methodology (2013 c1) (the Determination) and generates Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs). This is the third version of the Human Induced Regeneration methodology.
The project has issued Kyoto ACCUs in accordance with the date the carbon sequestration occurred. Kyoto ACCUs are issued for all carbon sequestration which has occurred after 14 May 2013 and non-Kyoto ACCUs are issued for carbon sequestration that occurred prior to this date
| Methodology Determination | Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest – 1.1 Methodology Determination 2013 c1 |
| Project Declaration Date [1] | 10 July 2015 |
| Permanence Period | 100 years |
|
Baseline Period [2] (10 year period before project commencement) |
January 2002 – December 2011 |
|
Baseline management (Management during the Baseline Period) |
Suppression of development of forest cover through uncontrolled livestock grazing, uncontrolled feral animal populations. Confirmed by evidence. |
|
Modelling Commencement Date [3] (Date at which sufficient regeneration had started in the CEA) |
31 December 2011 & 1 January 2018 Note: the method requires there to be some vegetation present, at the modelling commencement in order to confirm that the area has the capacity to regenerate. |
| Modelling Tool | Reforestation Modelling Tool |
| Audit | There has been 1 audit undertaken by registered Greenhouse and Energy Auditors which has confirmed the project complies with the Methodology Determination and the requirements of the CFI Act in all material respects for the periods audited. The most recent audit report was issued on the 29 August 2016 |
HIR project Carbon Estimation Areas
What are Carbon Estimation Areas?
A CEA is an area of land within a project area where the project activity or activities are being carried out to sequester carbon (for example, the cessation of mechanical or chemical clearing or management of timing and extent of grazing to enable regeneration of vegetation to forest) and for which ACCUs can be credited[4].
These are the areas where project activities occur and where carbon abatement will be modelled applying standardised estimation formulae approved by the Clean Energy Regulator. There can be one or many CEAs on a Project Area.
Each CEA must contain areas of eligible land greater than 0.2ha in size in which the project activities are implemented and which have started to become native forest through regeneration.
- Eligible Land is land that didn’t have forest cover during the baseline period (ie. the 10 years before project commencement) and which has been used or managed in a way that suppresses development of forest cover.
- A particular area of land has Forest cover if the land has an area of at least 0.2 of a hectare and has trees that are 2 metres or more in height and provide crown cover of at least 20% of the land.
Stratification of Rose Isle HIR Project Area into CEAs
Stratification is the process of “demarcating the boundaries of CEAs from ineligible and non-implementation areas within a project area”[5].
There are Guidelines setting out how Project Areas are stratified into CEAs. These include rules about evidence, stratification and record keeping to support the requirements in the CFI Rule 2015 (2018 and 2019 Amendments) including key method eligibility requirements.
Stratification of the Rose Isle HIR Project was carried out in accordance with the Determination and first reported to the Clean Energy Regulator for a reporting period ending 30 June 2016.[6]
A summary of the stratification of the Rose Isle HIR Project is set out below:
| Project Area | 24,616 hectares |
| Number of Carbon Estimation Areas (CEA) [7] | 4 |
| Total Carbon Estimation Areas (CEA)Size | 7,722 hectares |
| Total area excluded from CEA | 16,895 hectares |
|
Excluded from CEA – Pre-existing forest cover (forest present at any time during the baseline period) |
8,807 hectares |
|
Excluded from CEA No forest potential (areas of land that do not meet the requirements of forest potential) |
8,024 hectares |
|
Excluded from CEA Non-project area (areas of land that are within the project area but excluded for other reason e.g. infrastructure or areas excluded for production purposes) |
64 hectares |
This map shows the project area boundary and the different elements of project design including the carbon estimation areas and exclusion areas. This stratification may reflect both initial stratification and subsequent revisions.
In order to inform the initial stratification of the Rose Isle HIR Project in accordance with the Determination, GreenCollar carried out field surveys and data collection. This included collection of data on existing vegetation species, photos and a detailed site description.
Satellite imagery and remote sensing datasets were used to identify eligible land and exclusion areas. The extent of exclusion areas (totalling 16,895 ha), comprised of pre-existing forest cover (8,807 ha) and areas which classified as having no forest potential (8,024 ha). Through this process a final eligible CEA area of 7,722 ha was confirmed.
This maps shows a current satellite image of the project area. Satellite imagery and remote sensing datasets were used to identify eligible land and exclusion areas.
This map shows a summary of all CEA and Exclusion Areas.
Project Sequestration and Abatement
This version of the HIR Methodology required using the Reforestation Modelling Tool to determine the sequestration of carbon stocks and emissions required to calculate the net abatement amount for each reporting period. The carbon dioxide equivalent net abatement amount in relation to a reporting period for the project is taken to be the change in carbon stock for the project area less the project emissions. Any carbon stock that accumulated by the crediting start date for the project is calculated as the initial carbon stock and is removed from the calculation of abatement as the proponent is not entitled to credits for it.
See below for the average per hectare sequestration for the Rose Isle HIR Project.
Implementation & Monitoring
The activities for the project are:
- the management of the timing & extent of grazing, and
- the management, in a humane way, of feral animals
Since project commencement these activities have been undertaken across the project area to assist the regeneration of native forest in attaining forest cover. Once the initial offsets report has been completed, GreenCollar works closely with the landholder of the project property to collect land management information every quarter. This is reviewed and reported on in each offsets report.
A summary of monitoring activities and evidence collection undertaken on this project is set out below:
- Evidence collection in relation to grazing and herd management
- Evidence collection in relation to removal and reduction of feral animals
- Evidence of fire management activities
- Evidence collection from landholder as to other land management activities as relevant
- Change detection assessments
- Repeat biomass inventory surveys to track biomass change of regenerating vegetation
- Daily fire hotspot monitoring and review of Seasonal Fire Risk
- Review of SPEI drought index
- Regeneration Gateway Checks
These surveys are currently not required under the HIR method but are implemented by GreenCollar to provide additional assurance that biophysical threats to carbon stores such as grazing, drought and fire are not negatively impacting the regeneration and to track progress of regeneration of the native forest. In addition, the data collected is utilised for broader research purposes.
This map shows the points within the project area where vegetation biomass surveys were conducted as part of the monitoring process.
A Biomass Waypoint is a randomly allocated point within the project area where sampling data is collected.
Regeneration Checks
The Guidelines require that Proponents must provide regeneration checks at least once every five years from the start of the project’s last or only crediting period until CEAs pass their forest cover assessment date[8], and upon request by the Clean Energy Regulator.
A summary of regeneration checks required for the Rose Isle HIR Project is set out below:
|
Regeneration Check: Year 6 7.5% canopy cover at 100ha scale[9] |
01 September 2019 – Completed |
|
Regeneration Check: Year 10 10% canopy cover at 10ha scale[10] |
10 July 2024 |
| Forest Cover Assessment Date [11] | 10 July 2030 |
The process and methodology includes one or more of the three evidence requirements and reporting:
- Evidence level 1: Change detection analysis, or
- Evidence level 2: Remote sensing analysis and/or
- Evidence level 3: Field data; and
- Reporting
Project Area Files
GIS shapefiles for the project can be downloaded here. These files detail the project stratification including the carbon estimation areas and exclusion areas.
[1] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011 Section 27
[2] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest—1.1) Methodology Determination 2013 c1 Section 1.3
[3] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) (Human-Induced Regeneration of a Permanent Even-Aged Native Forest—1.1) Methodology Determination 2013 c1 Section 4.5
[4] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[5] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[6] The initial stratification was reported on prior to the public release of the Guidelines on stratification, evidence and records in May 2019. These guidelines also set out administrative arrangements for projects that have previously reported, including a pragmatic approach that will be taken in situations where additional evidence is required to meet these guidelines. Additionally, the project is defined as an existing project in accordance with Section 9AA of the CFI Rule 2015.
[7] Supplementary Guidance from the Clean Energy Regulator on 19 November 2014 allows participants to choose to combine several CEAs into one CEA. For example, where small CEAs are located next to each other and share common features.
[8] Forest cover assessment date has the same meaning as that given by section 9AA(6) of the CFI Rule.
[9] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[10] Guidelines on evidence, stratification and records 8 May 2019
[11] Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Rule 2015 Section 9AA(6)
