fbpx Skip to main content

How the Emissions Reduction Fund Works for You

The Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) encourages emission reduction through incentive. It has been administered by the Clean Energy Regulator (CER) since its inception in 2015, when it was then called the Carbon Credits (Carbon Farming Initiative) Act 2011. The ERF is a voluntary scheme that provides incentives for participants to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases they produce, and earn Australian Carbon Credit Units (ACCUs) for every tonne of carbon reduced or stored through a project. Projects can then sell ACCUs to businesses, or to the Australian government through an auction to gain a new and diversified income.

Throughout the history of the Emissions Reduction Fund, the majority of the ACCUs have been sold back into the government, but with the ACCU price reaching a record high this year amid growing net zero commitments from a number of major Australian companies, that may be about to change.

For land managers and organisations wanting to improve and diversify their income by accruing ACCUs, the first step is to successfully register a project — the methodology of which must be approved. Vegetation management projects (including avoided clearing, avoided deforestation and Human-Induced Regeneration) are popular carbon farming methodologies. But equally, soil carbon projects (including changes to agricultural practices such as tilling, irrigation, and spraying regimes)  provide alternative ways to reduce on-farm emissions and increase greenhouse gas absorption. Other project areas include waste, environmentally sensitive burning, energy consumption and transport.

The ERF is a boon for farmers wanting to earn income by improving both their farm and landscape — not to mention companies wanting to find ways to offset carbon in their value chains. But naturally, there are always pros and cons.

One critique of the ERF is in how it auctions ACCUs for government sale. Though, calling it an auction is slightly misleading as it’s more like a tendering process, where project managers bid for contracts with the CER, nominating their projects and the number and the unit price of ACCUs they would be willing to accept. The most competitive prices win contracts for ACCU-generating projects, and prices below the CER’s ‘benchmark’ are not accepted. This benchmark is often a point of criticism, as some think it’s prohibitively high and doesn’t allow an appropriate level of reward for high-value projects. Equally, many want to see the bar lowered – to drive more emission reduction for their taxpayer dollar, so that the project’s funding is actually enough to meet Australia’s climate commitments.

Another criticism of the ERF is its baseline for larger emitters. Despite being a largely voluntary scheme, the ERF has a built-in safeguard mechanism where a cap is set for emissions (100,000 tonnes of CO2 or equivalent per year) and larger polluters are obligated to keep their net emissions below baseline by either lowering their output or purchasing ACCUs to offset them. Many believe this baseline could (and should) be lowered.

However, the incentive approach, rather than a ‘stick’ approach, is certainly working to some degree. The CER confirmed that 16 million tonnes of emissions reductions were credited under the ERF in 2020. And with a flurry of ACCU-hungry net zero commitments locally and globally, demand may soon even outpace supply and change where the majority of ACCUs are purchased, forcing a move away from the scheme’s history of government purchasing.


Related Articles

19 Jun 2023

Reef Credits – 3 different approaches to meet different needs

When Reef Credits launched in 2020, there was just one way farmers and other land managers could get involved – by improving fertiliser management to reduce the flow of dissolved inorganic nitrogen to the Great Barrier Reef. Now, three years later, there are two new ways to get involved that suit a broader spectrum of farming operations.
19 Jun 2023

Reef Credits or Grants – carefully considering the best options for you

Environmental markets are not dissimilar to farming or commodity markets. The difference being, instead of food or fibre production, environmental markets measure and place a value on and trade in cleaner air, water or improved habitat and biodiversity.
13 Jun 2023

What are Reef Credits and how are they generated?

Being paid to implement best practice land management and deliver cleaner water to the Reef, without negatively impacting productivity may seem too good to be true. But according to GreenCollar Business Development Manager Bart Dryden, and the numerous farmers already running Reef Credit projects, it really is a win:win transaction that benefits both the farmer and the environment.
07 Mar 2023

The impact of fire on carbon projects

Rain, drought, flood and fire. All elements that impact how a property is run and require constant attention and management. And while good rainfall seasons are always welcome, the corresponding build-up of vegetation flows through to the need to manage fire risk as weather conditions turn.
07 Mar 2023

Does my land have carbon project potential? How to assess if carbon farming is right for you.

When considering a carbon project on your property, one of the most obvious questions is: does my land have carbon project potential? There are many obvious things to be considered,...
31 Jan 2023

The COP15 agreement on biodiversity – how has it been received?

The United Nations Biodiversity Conference, COP15, concluded in mid December in Montreal, Canada with an ambitious and historic global agreement among 196 of the almost 200 countries in attendance, though...